]]>Well, I’m not sure if the “e-” should be dropped. Dropping could be too radical, and the e actually “adds” some meaning.
But I’m also not happy with the suggestion from Peter: to consider Participation and e-Participation as two very related things, but somehow also different: e-Participation understood as an extra channel for participation. Thus, we [...]
]]>Again: everybody is invited to reflect.
(this image was introduced and partly explained as part of the discussion on the previous post: Impressions of the eDem 09 conference in Vienna). Reproduced below:
.
Anyway, let’s go back: we were saying that the diminishing “(e)” does not change the nature of Participation.
But as time goes by, it will completely [...]
]]>“Evolution” of the views on “What participation is”??
Everybody is invited to reflect on it.
—–
ARNSTEIN, S.R. (1969) “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, American Institute of Planners Journal, nº 35 (4): págs. 216-224.IAPP (2000) AIP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, Westminster: International Association for Public Participation.
GRAMBERGER, M. (2001) Citizens as Partners: OECD handbook on Information, Consultation [...]