Profile photo of John Heaven (TuTech Innovation GmbH)

There’s more to eParticipation than Facebook

19. May 2011 – 16:57 by John Heaven (TuTech Innovation GmbH)

Research at the University of Westminster has come to the preliminary conclusion that proprietary social networking tools (such as Facebook and Twitter) are not sufficient to mobilise political activists, but that a mixture of open-source and proprietary tools is necessary to address their particular needs. Drawbacks to proprietary solutions include security concerns and the absence of features that are tailored to activists’ requirements.
(See E-Government Bulletin article.)

The research applies to non-state actors, and thus cites Amnesty’s “Save The Human” website and an open-source platform called “Crabgrass”, both of which have functionality that is tailored to the needs of organising activists. But does this also have implications for government organisations such as local authorities?

I think it does, because there are types of political participation that are less often initiated by grass-roots activists but instead usually organised (or commissioned) by government. Examples include participatory budgeting, which often requires software that is specifically designed for the purpose, and online spatial planning such as our own DEMOS-Plan, which is specifically designed to replace paper-based processes by integrating interactive online maps and plans. A further advantage of working with bespoke software is that amendments can be made to reflect users’ wishes. Nevertheless, the research mentions the effectiveness of Facebook and similar social networks for publicity purposes.

So I think it’s a welcome reminder that government isn’t always reinventing the wheel if it commissions bespoke consultation software instead of using generic social networking tools, and of the role that social networks can play in encouraging political participation.

Be Sociable, Share!
  1. One Response to “There’s more to eParticipation than Facebook”

  2. By Andy Williamson on Aug 22, 2012

    Hi John, I think you’re right. Commercial SNS like Facebook are a vital tool as they are perfect for spreading a message, recruitment and building social capital over the longer term. But they are inherently poor places for high quality engagement to occur. It’s pretty clear to me from my work that we need both public networks and proprietary platforms (not saying they can’t be built on open platforms, just proprietary in terms of purpose and content).

Post a Comment

The PEP-NET Blog uses the gravatar service to display your picture next to comments!